Overheads: Meaning
Meaning: Overheads are
indirect costs. They do not participate in the production process directly
rather they support and facilitate the production or service process. The
relationship or connection as direct or indirect is with reference to or from
the point of view of any cost centre, generally, this is the core or main
activity of the entity. To exemplify, while manufacturing furniture, cost of
wood, salary of carpenter, nails, glue, sandpaper, design/drawing of particular
furniture are examples of direct costs.
However, expenses on travelling,
telephone bill, insurance premium, bank charges, salary of security personnel,
etc. do not take part directly or cardinally in the making of furniture rather
they provide an eco-system necessary to carry out main, core or cardinal
activity of the cost centre. Such costs are indirect costs and can either be
indirect material or indirect labour or indirect expenses.
Another peculiarity which overhead may
contain that benefit of overhead is not entirely consumed by the cost centre or
production process under question, that is they are joint costs. This leads to
a very tricky problem of charging various activities or cost centres with that
portion of overhead cost which relates to the concerned cost centre or
production process or service. For example, if general manager is devoting only
one fifth of his time with cost centre A, then it would be just to charge only
fifth of his salary to the cost centre
Following general principles should be kept in view while considering whether an item of expenditure is to be treated as overhead:
- Overhead comprises of indirect costs, i.e. the costs
which cannot be directly charged or allocated to any particular job, process
or product. Thus, the relationship of the items of expenditure to product,
job etc., must be seen.
- Direct costs are not to be treated as overheads. But in
certain cases, even direct expenses may be treated as overheads; for
example, when the cost of a particular item like screws, nuts, bolts etc.
though incurred for a particular job or product is so small that it is not
convenient to charge them as direct costs, is to be apportioned as
overheads over the jobs or products.
- Overheads may be attached to a cost centre in
accordance with the principles of benefit and I or responsibilities. The benefit principle implies that if a
cost centre occupies a proportion of a larger unit of space for which
standing charges such as rent and rates are exactly ascertainable, it
should be charged with a due proportion of such costs. The responsibility principle implies
that as the departmental head has no control over the amount of rent and
rates paid, these being fixed by decisions of others, his department
should not bear any allocation of them.
- All expenditures of capital nature should be excluded
from costs and shall not be treated as overheads.
- All expenditures which do not relate to cost, such as
penal rates of interest on loans, donations, subscriptions, income-tax
etc., are excluded from costs and shall not be treated as overheads.
- If it is not convenient to charge items of direct costs
to individual jobs, processes or products, it is advisable to apportion
these costs as overhead. For example, electricity charges can be treated
as direct costs if electric consumption meters are installed for separate
machines or departments but when this is not so, the total electricity
bill may be allocated and apportioned over various jobs, products or
processes in the form of overheads.
- All indirect expenses of such nature for which cash has
been paid or liability contracted or a loss in capital value sustained
should be treated as overheads. An example of the first type would be
telephone bills or electricity charges paid by the factory and an example
of the third type would be depreciation of fixed assets in the factory or
the office.
- The journey of overheads in costing travels through following
1. Collect and classify overheads as (i)
Manufacturing (ii) Office & Overheads (iii) Selling and Distribution
overheads
2. On the basis of variability,
overheads can be classified as (i) Variable (ii) Fixed and (iii) Semi-variable
overheads
3. Semi-variable overheads present characteristics
of both fixed and variable overheads. For practical purposes variable and fixed
components need to be segregated. Methods used for this are: (i) High-low point
method (ii) Scatter Diagram (iii) Method of Averages (iv) Simultaneous Equations
method
4. Overheads which are wholly and
entirely related to a particular department (cost centre) should be allocated to
that department
5. Joint or common expenses/overheads should
be apportioned to various department benefitted by that overhead on some
suitable basis.
6. Overheads allocated and apportioned
to service departments should be transferred or charged to production departments.
This is known as re-apportionment or re-distribution or secondary distribution
of overheads.
7. Add all overheads i.e. allocated,
apportioned and re-apportioned to arrive at total overheads for that
department.
8. Divide total overheads arrived in
step 7 by total of the base chosen, which may be either total units of output, quantity
of raw material used, labour hour consumed, Prime cost, machine hours used or
any other which may be suitably chosen to serve the purpose.
9. Overhead absorption rate may either
be (i) actual or normal (ii) Predetermined or (iii) Blanket
10. The outcome under step 8 is known as
overhead absorption rate expressed in terms of say percentage of quantity of
raw material, Direct labour hours, Prime cost or Machine hour.
11. Methods of re-apportionment of
overheads: (A) under Non-reciprocal situation, two methods are available i.e. (i)
Direct redistribution (ii) Step method or secondary method and under reciprocal
situation, three methods are available i.e. (i) Repeated distribution method
(ii) Trial and error method (iii) Simultaneous equations
In other words, following steps are carried out:
(A) Preliminary work comprising of (i) identification and collection (ii) Nomenclature of items (iii) Classification i.e. grouping and codification and
(B) Secondary
steps involving (i) Allocation (ii) Apportionment (iii) Re-apportionment
(iv)Absorption (v) Applying supplementary rates
Classification of overheads: Normally overheads are classified on the basis of function towards which they are expended viz.
Identification and collection of overheads: Overheads are routine expenses i.e. present outlay or future liability to pay for resources consumed. To identify an overhead, one has to physically visit the production facility or cost centre. A careful study of the commercial activity, processes/steps involved, roles assigned and undertaken help in understanding the nature of an expense leading to correct identification of overheads. Next step is proper nomenclature and coding of overheads. They should be properly named so the reader can clearly gauge the nature of expense. Coding helps in maintaining accuracy and speed, specially, with reference to modern age accounting software. Collection of overheads involves scrutiny and capturing of data from bills, invoices, payments through cheques or cash, payment registers, journal registers, contract notes etc to collect first hand information.
Collection of overheads involves:
(I) identification of overheads such that the overheads /expenses have a relationship with the cost centre though an indirect one. Assessing the primary and secondary sources of data with respect to overheads. For example for production overheads one may have to visit the actual operation place and examine the records maintained there. Overheads relating to material procurement may be collected from purchase and stores records viz. invoices and receipt-issue registers/ledgers. Similarly overheads with respect to labour can be collected from the records of payroll department, appointment letters, wage/salary payment registers etc.
(ii) Making a list of such expenses and classifying them under appropriate group representing a particular type of expenses say office expenses, administrative expenses, conversion expenses etc. These groups are generally pre-planned according to the cost objective and are also known as cost pools. There is a popular technique of codification i.e. numerical or even alpha-numerical such that names, accounts, parent-child relationship is represented by codes. This increases ease, accuracy and automation.
(iii) If possible and desired, overheads should further be classified as fixed and variable overheads based on their behaviour.
For examples of office & administrative and selling & distribution overheads please refer above.
Classification of overheads: Normally overheads are classified on the basis of function towards which they are expended viz.
(i) Production overheads. Examples:
(ii) Office & Administration overheads and
(iii) Selling & Distribution overheads.
Classification on the basis of behaviour
Overheads are also classified on the basis of behaviour of overheads viz.
(i) Fixed overheads,
(ii)Variable overheads and
(iii) Semi-Variable overheads
Semi variable overheads need some intervention to arrive at a just segregation into fixed and variable components:
Following methods are generally used to segregate fixed and variable component from such mixed costs i.e. semi-variable:
(i) High-low point method
(ii) Method of averages
(iii) Scatter diagram or graphical method
(iv) using simultaneous equation method method
(v) By using other mathematical models in case variable costs are not linear in nature. this may involve use of classical distribution models or other complex models requiring use of computers.
Overhead Class
|
Meaning
|
Examples
|
Factory or Manufacturing
or Production Overhead
|
indirect cost incurred
for manufacturing or
production activity in a
factory. Includes all
expenditures incurred
from the procurement of
materials till it is converted into finished product.
|
(i) Stock keeping
expenses, (ii) Repairs and
maintenance of plant, (iii)
Depreciation of factory
building, (iv) Indirect
labour, (v) cost of primary
packing (vi) Insurance
of plant and machinery
etc. Production overhead
include administration
costs relating to
production, factory, works
or manufacturing.
|
Office
and Administrative
Overheads
|
Office
and Administrative
overheads
are
expenditures
incurred
on all
activities relating
to
general management
and
administration
of an
organisation. It
includes
formulating
the
policy, directing
the
organisation and
controlling
the operations
of an
undertaking which
is not
related directly
to production,
selling,
distribution,
research or
development
activity or
function.
|
(i)
Salary paid to office
staffs,
(ii) Repairs and
maintenance
of office
building,
(iii) Depreciation
of
office building (iv)
postage
and stationery,
(v)
Lease rental in case of
operating
lease (in case of
finance
lease, lease rental
excluding
finance cost)
(vi)
accounts and audit
expenses etc.
|
Selling
and Distribution
Overheads
|
(i)
Selling overhead:
expenses
related to sale
of
products and include
all
indirect expenses in
sales
management for the
organisation.
(ii)
Distribution overhead:
cost
incurred on making
product
available for sale
in the
market.
|
(i)
Salesmen commission,
(ii)
Advertisement cost, (iii)
Sales
office expenses etc.
(i)
Delivery van expenses,
(ii)
Transit insurance,
(iii)
warehouse and
cold
storage expenses,
(iv)
secondary packing
expenses
etc.
|
Fixed Overhead
|
These
are the costs which
are
incurred for a period,
and
which, within certain
output
and turnover limits,
tend to
be unaffected
by
fluctuations in the
levels
of activity (output
or
turnover). They do
not
tend to increase or
decrease
with the changes
in output.
|
(i)
Salary paid to permanent
employees,
(ii)
Depreciation of building
and
plant and equipment,
(iii)
Interest on capital, (iv)
Insurance
|
Variable
Overhead
|
These
costs tend to vary
with
the volume of activity.
Any
increase in the activity
results
in an increase in
the
variable cost and vice-versa.
|
(i)
Indirect materials,
(ii)
Power and fuel, (iii)
lubricants,
(iv) tools and
spares etc.
|
Semi-Variable
Overheads
|
These
costs contain
both
fixed and variable
components
and are
thus,
partly affected by
fluctuations
in the level of
activity.
|
(i)
Electricity cost, (ii) water
cost,
(iii) telephone and
internet expenses etc.
|
Indirect
materials
|
Materials
which do not
normally
form part of the
finished
product (cost
object)
are known as
indirect
materials.
|
(i)Stores
used for
maintaining
machines
and
buildings (lubricants,
cotton
waste, bricks etc.)
(ii)
Stores used by service
departments
like power
house,
boiler house,
canteen
etc.
|
Indirect employee cost
|
Employee
costs which
cannot
be allocated but
can be
apportioned to or
absorbed
by cost units or
cost
centres is known as
indirect
employee.
|
(i)
Salary paid to foreman
and
supervisor
(ii)
Salary paid to
administration
staff etc.
|
Indirect expenses
|
Expenses
other than
direct
expenses are known
as
indirect expenses,
that
cannot be directly,
conveniently
and wholly
allocated
to cost centres.
|
(i)
Rates & taxes, (ii)
insurance,
(iii) depreciation,
(iv)
advertisement
expenses etc.
|
Controllable
costs
|
These
are those costs
which
can be controlled
by the
implementation of
appropriate
managerial
influence
and proper
policies.
|
(i)
Materials cost, (ii) wages
and
salary, (iii) power and
fuel etc.
|
Uncontrollable
costs
|
Overhead
costs which
cannot
be controlled by
the
management even
after
the implementation
of
appropriate managerial
influence
and proper
polices
are known as
uncontrollable
costs.
|
(i)
Rates and taxes, (ii)
Depreciation,
(iii) Interest
on
borrowings
|
Allocation of overheads
Next step in overhead study or accounting is ‘Allocation’ of overheads. Allocation of overheads involves charging whole amount of overhead to the particular cost centre or department based on the understanding that overhead is fully and directly related to the cost object or cost centre.
Example Suppose a particular component testing machine is installed at pathology department then insurance premium cost for that machine should be allocated fully to pathology department only.
When items of cost are identifiable directly and entirely with some products or departments such costs are charged to such cost centres. This process is known as cost allocation. Wages paid to workers of service department can be allocated to the particular department. Indirect materials used by a particular department can also be allocated to the department. Cost allocation calls for two basic factors – (i) Concerned department/product should have caused the cost to be incurred, and (ii) exact amount of cost should be computable.
Apportionment of overheads
When items of cost cannot directly
charge to or accurately identifiable with any cost centres, they are prorated
or distributed amongst the cost centres on some predetermined basis. This
method is known as cost apportionment. Thus, we see that items of indirect
costs residual to theprocess of cost allocation are covered by cost
apportionment. The predetermination of suitable basis of apportionment is very
important and usually following principles are adopted – (i) Service or use
(ii) Survey method (iii) Ability to bear. The basis ultimately adopted should
ensure an equitable share of common expenses for the cost centres and the basis
once adopted should be reviewed at periodic intervals to improve upon the
accuracy of apportionment.
Apportionment of overheads is done in case where overheads are common to more than one department or cost centre. In such a situation, overheads are apportioned to concerned departments on an equitable basis. Apportionment of overheads is thus the distribution of overheads to more than one cost centre on some equitable basis.
What is equitable basis will depend upon the judicious choice of the executive, however there are two commonly accepted guiding factors:
(I) Cause and effect relationship: here activity is the cause while expense is the effect
(ii) share of benefit: again, the portion of overhead to be charged to a particular cost centre or department should be rateable to the benefit derived by that department or cost centre from that overhead.
Some common bases used are
Item of overhead
|
Basis of apportionment
|
1.
(i) Rent and other building expenses
(ii)
Lighting and heating (conditioning)
(iii)
Fire precaution service
(iv)
Air- conditioning
|
Floor
area, or volume of department
|
2.
(i) Perquisites
(ii)
Labour welfare expenses
(iii)
Time keeping
(iv)
Personnel office
(v)
Supervision
|
Number
of workers
|
3.
(i) Compensation to workers
(ii)
Holiday pay
(iii)
ESI and PF contribution
(iv)
Perquisites
|
Direct
wages
|
4.
General overheads
|
Direct
labour hour, or Direct wages, or
Machine
hours.
|
5.
(i) Depreciation of plant and machinery
(ii)
Repairs and maintenance of plant and machinery
(iii)
Insurance of stock
|
Capital
values
|
6.
(i) Power/steam consumption
(ii)
Internal transport
(iii)
Managerial salaries
|
Technical
estimates
|
7.
Lighting expenses (light)
|
No.
of light points, or Area or Metered
units
|
8.
Electric power (machine operation)
|
Horse
power of machines, or Number of machine hour, or value of machines or units
consumed.
|
9.
(i) Material handling
(ii)
Stores overhead
|
Weight
of materials, or volume of
materials,
or value of materials or unit of materials.
|
Reapportionment of overheads: This is also known as secondary apportionment and arises where there are (I) main activity or product centre and (ii) service or support centres.
Service or support centres can be viewed as facilities which do not take a direct or cardinal part in the main revenue producing activity but provides support to the main or principal activity to function smoothly. Few examples of support departments or centres are Public Relation office, Post sales customer support cell, General maintenance, IT support cell, Accounts department etc.
In a multi-product/service scenario as is the case with a hospital, support centres are providing facilities to more than one department or cost centre, in such a case common indirect costs are first apportioned to service departments as well as principal departments in first round.
Next the total indirect costs of service departments so arrived at, as a result of first round of apportionment of overheads, are re-apportioned to the principal cost centres. This second apportionment of overheads of service departments to main or principal departments is known as secondary apportionment or re-apportionment of overheads.
To understand this, one can visualise the services of general administration department of a multi-specialty hospital. The general manager or administrator would be spending his time for not one single department but would be devoting time to issues relating to all departments as per merit or his discretion. Thus, the expenses of administration department would be apportioned not only to principal revenue generating activities like that of radiology department, pathology department, cardiology department, orthopedics department etc but also to support activities and departments like Accounts, Human Resource, Legal, Information & Technology, Inventories/Stores, Purchase etc.
The purpose of above exercise is to arrive at the total cost to be charged to that department and includes both direct and equitable share of indirect costs. This in turn is required to arrive at the pricing of the services or activity of the department.
Note: Apportionment is done on some just and reasonable basis. Basis is generally arrived at by following principles of
(i) higher the benefit received, higher the share of costs or burden
(ii) Ability to pay method
(iii) Survey Method
The re-apportionment of
the service department cost to the production department is known as secondary
distribution. This apportionment, of course, has to be done on some reasonable basis. More general bases that may be adopted for reapportionment are
given below:
Item
of overhead
|
Basis
of apportionment
|
1.
Maintenance and Repair
|
Direct
labour hours or Machine hours
|
2.
Planning and progress
|
Direct
labour wages, Asset value
|
3.
Tool room
|
Hours
worked.
|
4.
Canteen and Welfare
|
No.
of direct workers
|
5.
Hospital and Dispensary
|
No.
of employees
|
6.
Personnel Department
|
No.
of employees
|
7.
Time-keeping
|
No.
of card punched, No. of employees
|
8.
Computer Section
|
Computer
hours, Specific allocation to departments
|
9.
Power House (electric lighting cost)
|
Floor
area, Cubic content, No. of electric Points, Wattage
|
10.
Power House (electric power cost)
|
Horse
power, kWh, Horse power × Machine hours
|
11.
Stores Department
|
No.
of requisitions, Weight or value of Materials issued.
|
There is one more issue in re-apportionment. Sometimes, Service department A may serve only to production departments. Likewise service department B may also serve only to production departments. This is a simple situation it may or may not be the case. A more complex case is where Service department A supplies services to production departments as well as to Service department B. Similarly service department B may supply both to production departments as well as to Service department B.
Methods of reapportionment:
(i) Direct Method
(ii) Step method or non-reciprocal method
(iii) Reciprocal Methods
Reciprocal method is applied when cross supply of services are in practice. Reciprocal methods include:
(i) Repeated distribution method
(ii) Trial and Error method
(iii) Simultaneous method
Absorption of Overheads
Distributing total overheads over units of production or level of activity represents absorption of overheads.
To understand this, following points need to be kept in contemplation:
1. Absorption of overheads takes place at production departments.
2. There are two aspects to be identified before absorption of overheads can take place:
(i) Accumulation of total overheads i.e. allocated, apportioned and reapportioned
(ii) level of activity in that department represented either by resources consumed viz. material
consumed, Labour bill, Labour hours, Machine hours or by level of output i.e. units produced served etc.
3. Process: Total overheads so accumulated are divided by the unit produced or some other base representing level of activity. This is in fact absorption or distribution or recovery or levy or charge of overheads. Remember absorption in essence, represents burden of overheads bore by each unit of production.
4. Purpose: This helps in two ways: (i) in ascertaining per unit cost thus fixing per unit sale price
(ii) in ascertaining overhead absorption rate, which has its own use like forecasting of costs through predetermined overhead absorption rates.
Usually any of the following methods are adopted for cost
absorption –
(i) Direct Material Cost Percentage
(ii) Direct Labour Cost Percentage
(iii) Prime Cost Percentage
(iv) Direct Labour Hour Rate Method
(v) Machine Hour Rate, etc.
The basis should be selected after careful maximum accuracy of Cost Distribution to various production units. The basis should be reviewed periodically and corrective action whatever needed should be taken for improving upon the accuracy of the absorption.
(i) Direct Material Cost Percentage
(ii) Direct Labour Cost Percentage
(iii) Prime Cost Percentage
(iv) Direct Labour Hour Rate Method
(v) Machine Hour Rate, etc.
The basis should be selected after careful maximum accuracy of Cost Distribution to various production units. The basis should be reviewed periodically and corrective action whatever needed should be taken for improving upon the accuracy of the absorption.
Conversion Cost
This term is defined as the sum of
direct wages, direct expenses and overhead costs of converting raw material to
the finished products or converting a material from one stage of production to
another stage. In other words, it means the total cost of producing an article
less the cost of direct materials used. The cost of indirect materials and
consumable stores are included in such cost. The compilation of conversion cost
is useful in a number of cases. Where cost of direct materials is of
fluctuating nature, conversion cost is used to cost control purpose or for any
other decision making. In contracts/jobs where raw materials are on account of
the buyers conversion cost takes the place of total cost in the books of the
producer. Periodic comparison/review of the conversion cost may give sufficient
insight as to the level of efficiency with which the production unit is
operating.
Case of Over or Under Absorption of Overheads:
The amount of overhead absorption in
costs is the total amount of the overhead costs allotted to individual cost
units by application of overhead rate. Overhead costs are fully recovered from
production if actual rate method of absorption is adopted as the amount charged
to production is equal to the amount of overheads incurred. But when a
predetermined rate is used on the basis of budgeted overheads and the rate is
applied to the actual base, the actual overhead expenses may be different from
the charged or budgeted overhead expenses.
This leads us to a very important conclusion: Over or under absorption of overheads happens only when predetermined absorption rates are applied resulting in estimated or budgeted overheads. As estimated overheads are bound to vary from actual overheads, they will either be more or less than actual overheads resulting in over or under absorption of overheads.
There will be no over or under absorption of overheads, if absorption rates are based on actual overheads. (AND advantage or virtue of cost accounting to peek into future will also be lost)
If the amount absorbed is less than
the amount incurred which may be due to actual expenses exceeding the estimates
and/or the output or hours worked being less than the estimates, the difference
is known as under-absorption.
Under-absorption of overheads thus means the amount by which the absorbed
overheads fall short of the actual amount of overheads incurred. It represents
understating the costs as the overhead expenses incurred are not fully
recovered in the cost of jobs, processes etc.
On the other hand, if the amount
absorbed is more than the expenditure incurred due to expenses being less than
the estimates and/or the output or hours worked exceeding the estimates, it
would mean over-absorption of
overheads and will inflate the costs. Over-absorption of overheads thus means
the excess of overheads absorbed over the actual amount of overheads incurred.
Under or over-absorption of
overheads may arise due to any of the following reasons:
(i) Error in estimating overheads
(ii) Error in estimating of proper
volume
(iii) The actual hours worked may be
more or less than hours anticipated.
(iv) The basis upon which the
factory overheads are recovered from production may no longer be correct on
account of changes in the prices of material or wages rates.
(v) Work-in-progress might not have
been charged with its share of overhead in cost accounts.
(vi) Major unanticipated changes in
method of production might have occurred due to which an expense of a
non-recurring nature might have been incurred during the year.
(vii) Seasonal fluctuations in the
overhead expenses from period to period.
(viii) There may be some important changes in the work situation such as heavy overtime, introduction of another shift, substitution of manual labour by equipment etc.
(viii) There may be some important changes in the work situation such as heavy overtime, introduction of another shift, substitution of manual labour by equipment etc.
Accounting of Under and
Over-Absorbed Overheads:
The accounting treatment of under or
over-absorption of overheads depends upon the extent of such under or
over-absorption and the circumstances under which it arises.
Following are the main methods of disposal of under or over-absorption of overheads.
Following are the main methods of disposal of under or over-absorption of overheads.
(i) Use of Supplementary Rates:
If the amount of under or
over-absorption is considerable; the cost of job or process is adjusted by
means of supplementary levy of the overhead. Supplementary rate is calculated
by dividing the amount of under or over-absorption by the actual base.
Under-absorption is set right by the plus rate while over-absorption is
adjusted by minus rate. The supplementary rate may also be calculated as a
percentage of the amount absorbed.
Correction of overheads costs by a
supplementary rate is nothing but recovering the overhead by actual rates. All
the shortcomings of actual rate method will make the supplementary rate as
unnecessary and add to the clerical expenses. When the overhead rate is linked
with maximum attainable or normal capacity but other than actual capacity, then
calculation of supplementary rate will defeat the purpose (i.e. to reveal the
idle capacity) for which it is calculated.
Supplementary rate is useless in
those cases where in order to have a uniform charge of overhead throughout, the
accounting period is fixed in order to avoid seasonal fluctuations in the
overhead cost or level of activity.
Correction of costs through
supplementary rate is necessary when the management likes to maintain actual
historical costs for future comparison. Its use is made when prices are fixed
on cost plus basis.
The amount of under or
over-absorption at the end of the accounting period is adjusted in
work-in-progress, finished stock and cost of sales in proportion to direct
labour hours or machine hours or the values of the balances in each of these
accounts by the use of supplementary rate. Subsidiary records or individual
items are not corrected. The amounts so adjusted will be shown in the Balance
Sheet as deductions from or additions to the work-in-progress and finished
goods stock.
Under this method, the profit for
the period will be reduced or increased by the amount adjusted to cost of sales
and value of stock will increase or decrease by the amount adjusted to work-in-
progress and finished goods stock. The latter will affect the profit of the
subsequent period.
(ii) By Writing Off to Costing Profit and
Loss Account:
If the amount of under or over-
absorption is small, it may be written off to Costing Profit and Loss Account
instead of calculating a supplementary rate by complicated procedure.
Under-absorption due to idle facilities should be written off in this manner
whatever the amount may be.
The amount of under or
over-absorption at the end of accounting period is transferred to the Overhead
Suspense Account which is ultimately transferred to the Costing Profit and Loss
Account or directly to Costing Profit and Loss Account. If some portion of
under or over-absorption arises due to abnormal causes such as strikes,
lock-outs, major breakdown etc., then such portion should be carried over to
the next year and is taken into account while fixing the rate for that period.
The main defect of this method is
that it will distort the value of stock as the amount of under or
over-absorption of overheads is directly transferred to Costing Profit and Loss
Account and not allocated to the stock of work-in-progress and finished goods.
The value of such stock will either be under or over-stated in the next
accounting period. Under-absorption will reduce the profit of the concern by
the same figure for the period.
(iii) Absorption in the Accounts in
Subsequent Years:
The amount of under or over-
absorption of overheads may be carried over as deferred charge or deferred
credit to the next accounting period by transferring to a Suspense or Overhead
Reserve Account. The use of this method is justified when the normal business
cycle is more than one year and in the case of new projects and schemes when
the output is low in the initial stages of production and cannot bear the
entire share of overheads.
Under such circumstances, it is
desirable that some portion of such cost be carried over to the next period to
be absorbed in the production of subsequent years. One criticism which is
generally levied against this method is that cost should be absorbed in the
period in which it is incurred and utilized and should not be carried over to
the next period for the purpose of absorption as it will distort the costs for
the purpose of comparison.
Note: The process of allocation, apportionment and re-apportionment of overheads is collectively known as departmentalization of overheads
You are provided with the following
data relating to overheads of semi-variable nature, segregate the overheads
into fixed and variable components.
Month
|
Output (Units)
|
Semi-variable
cost (Rs.)
|
Jan
|
80
|
2,200
|
Feb
|
40
|
1,600
|
Mar
|
120
|
2,800
|
Apr
|
160
|
3,400
|
May
|
200
|
4,000
|
Jun
|
140
|
3,100
|
1st
Method: (High-Low point method)
If we observe output data highest
value is 200 in May and lowest value is 40 in Feb, difference of which is 160
Similarly, highest semi-variable
costs are 4000 in May and lowest being 1,600 in Feb, difference in which case
comes out to Rs.2,400
Dividing 2,400 by 160, we get variable
cost as Rs.15 per unit. Using this relationship in data of any month, say for
Jan, we get fixed cost: 2200 – (80 x 15) = 1000
IInd
Method: (Method of Averages)
Here we divide the data set in two
equal parts i.e. Jan to Mar and Apr to Jun (if there were odd month or number
of observations, middle observation would have been knowingly left to get two
equal parts).
Taking averages for both output and
semi-variable costs data sets, we get
For Jan-Mar: Av. output => (80+40+120)/3
= 80 and SV costs => (2200+1600+2800)/3 = 2200
For Apr-Jun: Av. output =>
(160+200+140)/3=166.67 and SV costs => (3400+4000+3100)/3
=>3500
Now, finding variable component per
unit => 3500-2200/166.67-80
ð
15/unit
Applying this relationship of
variable cost of Rs.15 per unit in any months data we can solve that fixed cost
element is Rs.1000/-
IIIrd Method: Graphical method or
Scatter diagram method
No comments:
Post a Comment